<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Learning to love your Mirror Lens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://olympuszuiko.wordpress.com/2007/02/24/learning-to-love-your-mirror-lens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://olympuszuiko.wordpress.com/2007/02/24/learning-to-love-your-mirror-lens/</link>
	<description>...just another amateur photographer's website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:25:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: azazel1024</title>
		<link>http://olympuszuiko.wordpress.com/2007/02/24/learning-to-love-your-mirror-lens/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>azazel1024</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olympuszuiko.wordpress.com/2007/02/24/learning-to-love-your-mirror-lens/#comment-316</guid>
		<description>Sawatzky, you might not be able to find such an adaptor. The mount type you are talking about is most like the Vivitar TX mount (it might be T-4). It is Vivitar&#039;s answer to the Tamron Adaptall system, but not nearly as prolific or successful. I don&#039;t believe there was ever a TX or T-4 adaptor made for EOS.

You can probably find a T-4 or TX adaptor to adapt the lens to M42 screw and then an M42-EOS adaptor to make it work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sawatzky, you might not be able to find such an adaptor. The mount type you are talking about is most like the Vivitar TX mount (it might be T-4). It is Vivitar&#8217;s answer to the Tamron Adaptall system, but not nearly as prolific or successful. I don&#8217;t believe there was ever a TX or T-4 adaptor made for EOS.</p>
<p>You can probably find a T-4 or TX adaptor to adapt the lens to M42 screw and then an M42-EOS adaptor to make it work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sawatzky</title>
		<link>http://olympuszuiko.wordpress.com/2007/02/24/learning-to-love-your-mirror-lens/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>sawatzky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olympuszuiko.wordpress.com/2007/02/24/learning-to-love-your-mirror-lens/#comment-315</guid>
		<description>I have a Vivitar 500mm f/11 cat with Canon FD mount adapter and rear element screw-on filters. It was $200 new. It&#039;s been a great lens, but I only use it in summer in full daylight. I am considering updating the t-mount with an EOS mount, but the Vivitar adapter mount is not a screw mount... it is a triple pin / groove  mount (I don&#039;t know if there&#039;s a proper term for that). On my 1.6x equiv. Canon XTi the 500mm would be the equivalent of an 800mm cat lens!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Vivitar 500mm f/11 cat with Canon FD mount adapter and rear element screw-on filters. It was $200 new. It&#8217;s been a great lens, but I only use it in summer in full daylight. I am considering updating the t-mount with an EOS mount, but the Vivitar adapter mount is not a screw mount&#8230; it is a triple pin / groove  mount (I don&#8217;t know if there&#8217;s a proper term for that). On my 1.6x equiv. Canon XTi the 500mm would be the equivalent of an 800mm cat lens!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajoy muralidhar</title>
		<link>http://olympuszuiko.wordpress.com/2007/02/24/learning-to-love-your-mirror-lens/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>ajoy muralidhar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olympuszuiko.wordpress.com/2007/02/24/learning-to-love-your-mirror-lens/#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the thoughtful comment, Cliff. You&#039;re right, of course... it&#039;s the in-camera &quot;crop&quot; factor is what I was referring to when I mentioned magnification. And you&#039;re right about another thing - one can get rid of all the complaints regarding the Mirror (and other old lenses) with digital post-processing. The contrast can be improved greatly even with the simplest of software, including Picasa.

Have you looked into any of the cheaply available super long T-mount lenses? The old Spiratone 400mm f/6.3 and Toyo 500mm f/8 long tubes are feasible to handhold now with  a higher ISO speed and Image stabilization. You will be pleasantly surprised. I&#039;ve a couple of posts on that subject, if you&#039;re interested. 

AJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the thoughtful comment, Cliff. You&#8217;re right, of course&#8230; it&#8217;s the in-camera &#8220;crop&#8221; factor is what I was referring to when I mentioned magnification. And you&#8217;re right about another thing &#8211; one can get rid of all the complaints regarding the Mirror (and other old lenses) with digital post-processing. The contrast can be improved greatly even with the simplest of software, including Picasa.</p>
<p>Have you looked into any of the cheaply available super long T-mount lenses? The old Spiratone 400mm f/6.3 and Toyo 500mm f/8 long tubes are feasible to handhold now with  a higher ISO speed and Image stabilization. You will be pleasantly surprised. I&#8217;ve a couple of posts on that subject, if you&#8217;re interested. </p>
<p>AJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cbrowland</title>
		<link>http://olympuszuiko.wordpress.com/2007/02/24/learning-to-love-your-mirror-lens/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>cbrowland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olympuszuiko.wordpress.com/2007/02/24/learning-to-love-your-mirror-lens/#comment-193</guid>
		<description>You have encouraged me to try a mirror lens, and I&#039;ve loved the Soligor C/D I found.

One thought on lenses, mirror and otherwise, on digital cameras. The digital sensor, APS-C on the Sony Alpha, has an aspect ratio of 1.5:1 compared to a 35mm film frame. That makes the field of view on a 500mm lens the same as a 750mm lens on film. It does NOT give the magnification of a 750mm lens. 

Straight out of the camera the Soligor C/D mirror and and an old Kimunor 500mm preset lens are giving me very similar images, the most noticeable difference is that the Kimunor has a little more contrast. Kimunors millimeters also seem to have been very slightly longer than the ones Soligor used.

I am finding that nearly all the complaints about mirror lenses (including contrast) are resolved with a digital camera and/or digital processing, right down to the donut bokeh. 

Although the optical viewfinder still looks like f8, with the 3 stop digital advantage provided by the combination of faster ISO and anti-shake this is the equivalent of a 500mm f2.8 lens! While digital technology does not make it longer, it does make it faster.

Thanks for a wonderful and thoughtful blog.

Regards,

Cliff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have encouraged me to try a mirror lens, and I&#8217;ve loved the Soligor C/D I found.</p>
<p>One thought on lenses, mirror and otherwise, on digital cameras. The digital sensor, APS-C on the Sony Alpha, has an aspect ratio of 1.5:1 compared to a 35mm film frame. That makes the field of view on a 500mm lens the same as a 750mm lens on film. It does NOT give the magnification of a 750mm lens. </p>
<p>Straight out of the camera the Soligor C/D mirror and and an old Kimunor 500mm preset lens are giving me very similar images, the most noticeable difference is that the Kimunor has a little more contrast. Kimunors millimeters also seem to have been very slightly longer than the ones Soligor used.</p>
<p>I am finding that nearly all the complaints about mirror lenses (including contrast) are resolved with a digital camera and/or digital processing, right down to the donut bokeh. </p>
<p>Although the optical viewfinder still looks like f8, with the 3 stop digital advantage provided by the combination of faster ISO and anti-shake this is the equivalent of a 500mm f2.8 lens! While digital technology does not make it longer, it does make it faster.</p>
<p>Thanks for a wonderful and thoughtful blog.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Cliff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jantrik</title>
		<link>http://olympuszuiko.wordpress.com/2007/02/24/learning-to-love-your-mirror-lens/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>jantrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olympuszuiko.wordpress.com/2007/02/24/learning-to-love-your-mirror-lens/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>nice article and being an impressionist from heart, i love image #3.

Pls take some time to browse http://www.photoduniya.com/

Cheers!
Ranjay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice article and being an impressionist from heart, i love image #3.</p>
<p>Pls take some time to browse <a href="http://www.photoduniya.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.photoduniya.com/</a></p>
<p>Cheers!<br />
Ranjay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
